City, Capital, and Gentrification: Case Studies of Istanbul and Ankara in the Context of David Harvey’s Spatial Theory
Keywords:
David Harvey, Sermaye Birikimi, Kent Kuramı, Mekân Üretimi, Marxizm, Kentsel Dönüşüm, Jel SınıflandırmasıAbstract
This study analyzes the relationship between capital accumulation and gentrification through the framework of David Harvey’s spatial theory, focusing on urban transformation cases in Istanbul and Ankara. According to Harvey's analysis of capitalist urbanization, space is an active instrument that is reproduced to overcome crises of capital accumulation. In this context, the commodification of urban space is examined through Harvey’s concepts such as the "secondary circuit of capital," the "spatio-temporal fix," and the "accumulation-destruction-reaccumulation" cycle. Using a comparative case analysis method, the gentrification practices in Tarlabaşı and Sulukule in Istanbul, and Hacı Bayram and Dikmen Valley in Ankara, are addressed as concrete reflections of neoliberal urban policies. The study reveals that projects in these areas, carried out in collaboration between the state (e.g., TOKİ, municipalities) and the private sector under the discourse of "urban renewal," displace existing low-income residents and redistribute urban rent. This process leads to the transfer of property, the deepening of class and spatial segregation, and the dismantling of the social fabric. In conclusion, while demonstrating with the Istanbul and Ankara examples that urban space is both an instrument and a product of capital accumulation, the study also provides a holistic evaluation by discussing Harvey's theory in light of Lefebvre's critiques.
References
Altındağ Belediyesi. (2022). 2022 Stratejik Planı. https://www.altindag.bel.tr/client/.../2022_stratejik_plan.pdf
Arıkan, F. S. (2010). Sulukule özelinde kentsel dönüşüm projelerinin hukuki boyutu (Yüksek lisans tezi, Galatasaray Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kamu Hukuku Anabilim Dalı).
Aslan, Ş. (2004). 1 Mayıs Mahallesi 1980 Öncesi Toplumsal Mücadeleler ve Kent. İstanbul: İletişim.
Bartu Candan, A., & Kolluoğlu, B. (2008). Emerging spaces of neoliberalism: A gated town and a public housing project in Istanbul. New Perspectives on Turkey, 39, 5–46.
Behar, D., & İslam, T. (Eds.). (2006). İstanbul'da "soylulaştırma": Eski kentte yeni sakinler. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press.
Brenner, N. (2013). Theses on urbanization. Public Culture, 25(1), 85–114.
Çalışkan, V., & Bıçakçı, A. B. (2010). The Sulukule renewal project in Istanbul: An analysis within the framework of urban regeneration. İTÜ A|Z, 7(1), 84–100.
Çavdar, A. (2013). Neoliberal kentte mekânın dönüşümü ve direniş: Tarlabaşı örneği. Mülkiye Dergisi, 37(2), 73–96.
De Coss-Corzo, A. (2022). Endless dispossession: looking at Mexico through David Harvey’s gaze. Alternautas. https://doi.org/10.31273/alternautas.v4i1.1052.
Enlil, Z. (2011). The neoliberal agenda and the changing face of an old İstanbul neighbourhood. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1), 156–170.
Erman, T., & Eken, A. (2004). The “other of the other” and “unregulated territories” in the urban periphery: Gecekondu violence in the 2000s with a focus on the case of Altındağ–Ankara. Cities, 21(1), 57–68
Fainstein, S. S., & Campbell, S. (Eds.). (2011). Readings in urban theory (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Güleç Solak, S. (2017). Mekân-kimlik etkileşimi: Kavramsal ve kuramsal bir bakış. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(1), 13–34.
Günay, Z., & Dökmeci, V. (2012). The role of neoliberal policies in the gentrification process: The case of Beyoğlu, Istanbul. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 457– 476.
Gündüz, A. (2020). Zamanın ve mekânın dönüşümü: David Harvey’nin penceresinden sermayenin kentleşmesi. Uluslararası Beşeri ve Sosyal Bilimler İnceleme Dergisi, 4(1), 50–65.
Güzey, Ö. (2013). Urban regeneration and increased competitive power: Ankara in an era of globalization. Cities, 30, 266–274.
Harvey, D. (1985). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital: Towards a critical geography. Routledge.
Harvey, David. (2003) (Çev: Mehmet Moralı) Sosyal Adalet ve Şehir. İstanbul: Metis.
Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. Verso.
Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.
Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. Verso.
İslam, T. (2006). İstanbul'da soylulaştırma: Galata örneği. In D. Behar & T. İslam (Eds.), İstanbul'da "soylulaştırma": Eski kentte yeni sakinler (ss. 113–156). İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
İstanbul Büyükşehir Belediyesi Şehir Planlama Müdürlüğü. Tarlabaşı Kentsel Dönüşüm Projesi. https://sehirplanlama.ibb.istanbul/tarlabasi-kentsel-donusum-projesi/ Erişim tarihi: 27 Mayıs 2025
Keyder, Ç. (Ed.). (1999). Istanbul: Between the global and the local. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Kurtuluş, H. (2005). İstanbul'da kentsel ayrışma: Sultanbeyli örneği. Bağlam Yayıncılık.
Kurtuluş, H. (2011). Neoliberal urban transformation in Turkey: The case of Dikmen Valley, Ankara. International Planning Studies, 16(1), 43–61.
Kurtuluş, H., & Uzun, C. N. (2012). Real estate development by Gulf capital in Istanbul: The case of "Dubai Towers". Built Environment, 38(2), 242–256.
Kuyucu, T., & Ünsal, Ö. (2010). ‘Urban transformation’ and the ‘propertisation’ of the urban poor: The case of Sulukule, Istanbul. Urban Studies, 47(3), 597–618.
Kuyucu, T., & Ünsal, Ö. (2010). “Urban transformation” as state-led property transfer: An analysis of two cases of urban renewal in Istanbul. Urban Studies, 47(7), 1479–1499.
Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? Urban Studies, 45(12), 2449–2470.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (2003). The right to the city. In N. Brenner & S. Elden (Eds.), Henri Lefebvre: Key writings (ss. 63–181). Continuum. (Orijinal çalışma 1968'de yayımlandı).
Lovering, J., & Türkmen, H. (2011). Bulldozer neoliberalism in Istanbul: The state-led construction of property markets, and the displacement of the urban poor. International Planning Studies, 16(1), 73–96.
Majumder, T. (2020). A Critical Analysis of Capitalism, Capital Accumulation and Crisis Theory in David Harvey. Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 21, 215- 235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976747920953009.
Marx, K. (2011). Kapital: Cilt I (M. Selik, Trans.). Yordam Kitap
Memlük, Y. (2013). Kentsel dönüşümün Ankara’daki yansımaları: Dikmen Vadisi örneği. Megaron, 8(1), 13–25.
Merrifield, A. (2000). Henri Lefebvre: A socialist in space. In M. Crang & N. Thrift (Eds.), Thinking space (pp. 167–182). Routledge.
Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. Guilford Press.
Musa, G. (2021). Emancipating the Place and Labor: Exploring a Possible Synthesis of David Harvey’s Theory of Capitalist Production of Spaces and Marx-Engels’ Emancipatory Class Politics. Mabini Review. https://doi.org/10.70922/5s1j3k60.
Özdemir, D. (2000). Kentsel rantların oluşumu ve bölüşümü. In 7. Ulusal Bölge Bilimi ve Bölge Planlama Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı (Cilt 1, ss. 249-262). Gazi Üniversitesi.
Özsoy, E., & Monet, N. A. (2018). Displacement through ‘urban transformation’: The case of Tarlabaşı, Istanbul. Housing Studies, 33(4), 544–563.
Penpecioğlu, M. (2013). Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşümün yasal ve kurumsal çerçevesi: Eleştirel bir bakış. İdealKent Kent Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(10), 120–147.
Pile, S., & Keith, M. (Eds.). (1997). Geographies of resistance. Routledge.
Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2), 99–108.
Schmid, C. (2008). Henri Lefebvre’s theory of the production of space: Towards a three- dimensional dialectic. In K. Goonewardena, S. Kipfer, R. Milgrom, & C. Schmid (Eds.), Space, difference, everyday life: Reading Henri Lefebvre (pp. 27–45). Routledge.
Scott, A. (2011). Emerging cities of the third wave. City, 15, 289- 321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.595569.
Smith, K. (2012). A Guide to Marx’s ‘Capital’ Vols I–III: The Rate of Profit and the Rate of Surplus Value in Capital, Vol. I, Ch. 9, Section 3, and Vol. III, Parts I and III. https://doi.org/10.7135/UPO9780857285775.016.
Smith, N. (1979). Toward a theory of gentrification: A back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal of the American Planning Association, 45(4), 538–548.
Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. Routledge.
Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. University of Georgia Press.
Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. Verso.
Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.
Şen, B. (2005). Türkiye’de kentsel dönüşüm: Kavramsal çerçeve ve uygulamalar. In Kentsel Dönüşüm Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı (ss. 15–30). TMMOB Mimarlar Odası İstanbul Büyükkent Şubesi.
Unwin, T. (2000). A Waste of Space? Towards a Critique of the Social Production of Space…. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0020-2754.2000.00011.X.
Uzun, N. (2006). Kentsel dönüşüm projelerinde kamu-özel sektör ortaklıkları ve Ankara örneği. Planlama Dergisi, 2006(1), 55–68.
Yırtıcı, H. (2008). Konut üzerinden ayrışma: İstanbul’da yeni konut üretim biçimleri ve mekânsal ayrışma. Toplum ve Bilim, (112), 136–161.
Yiğit, G. (2011). Kentsel yenileme ve İstanbul: Tarlabaşı örneği (Yüksek lisans tezi). Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ekonomi ve Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi (JEGS)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.